Protection

Protective Relay Element Testing: Pickup, Timing and Trip Path

Protective relay element testing applies simulated fault quantities to each protective function of a relay and confirms its pickup, timing, targets and output contacts. It shows that the relay will detect the abnormal condition it was set for and trip the right device.

An inverse time curve: the higher the current, the faster the trip, checked at several test points.

What it is

A protective relay watches current, voltage or other quantities and operates an output contact when an abnormal condition appears. Modern relays contain many protective elements, each with its own settings: overcurrent, undervoltage and overvoltage, frequency, directional, differential, distance, and others. Element testing exercises each enabled function one at a time with a relay test set that injects current and voltage signals, and checks how the relay responds. The relay may be electromechanical, solid-state or microprocessor-based, and may protect feeders, motors, generators, transformers, buses and the auxiliary equipment around them, including network protector relays, battery chargers and rectifiers, engine-generator emergency systems, motor starters, drives and regulating apparatus. The test covers the elements, their targets and indicators, and the output contacts that trip or alarm. The related element tests for specific device functions are described on their own pages.

Why it is done

Protective relays spend nearly all of their lives doing nothing, and the only way to know that they will act when needed is to make them act under test. Settings can be entered wrongly, changed during maintenance, lost when firmware is updated or never loaded at all. Electromechanical relays drift as springs, bearings and contacts age. A relay that fails to pick up leaves a fault on the system until a slower backup clears it, which risks equipment damage and widespread outages, and a relay that picks up when it should not takes a healthy circuit out of service. In a microprocessor relay many functions can be enabled, disabled or blocked in logic, so a protection that is on the drawing may not be in service. Testing proves that the elements named in the protection study are present, correctly set and wired to trip.

The principle

Each protective element compares a measured quantity with a setting and, when the condition persists long enough, closes an output. A simple overcurrent element picks up when current exceeds a threshold and trips after a definite time or along an inverse-time curve. A voltage element watches for low or high voltage. A directional element decides which way power or fault current flows. A differential element compares currents entering and leaving a protected zone. The test set reproduces the signals the relay would see in a fault, at levels just below and above each setting, so that pickup and dropout are found and the response time is measured on the output. Targets and indicators show which element operated, which is how a real event is analyzed afterward, so they are part of the function being proven. The settings are derived from a coordination study, and the test confirms that the device carries those settings and behaves as they intend.

How it is performed

The relay is isolated from the circuits it trips and from live instrument transformer secondaries under the owner's lockout and work-permit procedures, and current-transformer secondaries are never opened while energized. The relay's settings are read from the device and compared with the approved settings sheet before testing, and any difference is resolved first. A relay test set capable of the required currents, voltages and angles is connected at the relay's test switch or terminals. For each enabled element the signal is raised until the element picks up and lowered until it drops out, and timing is measured by applying a stepped fault condition and recording the interval to the output contact. Inverse-time elements are tested at more than one point on the curve. Directional and differential elements are tested with the angles or currents that distinguish operate from restraint. Targets, indicators, alarm and trip outputs are checked, and where the procedure requires it a trip test is made through to the breaker or the trip coil. Insulation resistance of the relay circuits is checked when the procedure calls for it. Everything is restored and the final settings are confirmed.

What is recorded

The record includes the relay identification, firmware or revision where relevant, the approved settings the relay was compared with, the pickup, dropout and timing found for each element tested, the results for targets, indicators and output contacts, any trip-through test to the breaker, the test set used with its calibration status, and the conditions of the test. As-found and as-left results are kept separately, with every adjustment noted, so that a changed setting can be traced.

How results are judged

Each element is judged against the setting in the protection study and the accuracy the manufacturer states for the relay, which varies with the type of element and the technology. Pickup and dropout should be consistent with the setting, timing should follow the set curve, and outputs and targets should match the logic. Results from similar elements, such as the three phases of an overcurrent function, should agree, and trends against earlier tests reveal drift in older relays. ANSI/NETA ATS-2025 describes acceptance testing of protective relays and related protective functions. For maintenance see ANSI/NETA MTS-2023. Refer to your own licensed copies for the values and tolerances.

Variations

Acceptance tests prove the full set of enabled elements and set the baseline, while maintenance tests focus on those functions that matter most and on drift. Electromechanical relays need attention to calibration, contact condition and targets, whereas microprocessor relays need settings verification, logic checks and confirmation that the right functions are enabled. Network protector relays are tested for their closing and tripping characteristics as part of the protector. On battery chargers and rectifiers, the protective functions are tested as part of the charger checks, and IEEE 946-2020 addresses the design of DC auxiliary power systems. For constant-current regulators in airfield lighting, FAA AC 150/5345-10H sets requirements for the regulator's protective features. Motor protection devices and drives are tested for their own overload and fault functions.

Where this test is called for

The equipment classes and standard sections that call for this test, and the UltraDb forms that carry it.

Batteries and DC Systems

Direct-Current Systems, Rectifiers Acceptance
Cited in: IEEE 946-2020 7.5.3; IEEE 946-2020 7.5.4

Adjustable Speed Drives

Adjustable Speed Drive System Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.17.B.5; ATS-2025 7.17.D.5; MTS-2023 7.17.B.5

Engine Generators

Emergency Systems Engine Generator Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.22.1.B.2; ATS-2025 7.22.1.D.2; MTS-2023 7.22.1.B.2

Rotating Machinery and Motor Control

Low-Voltage Motor Control and Starter Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.16.1.1.B.3; ATS-2025 7.16.1.1.D.3; MTS-2023 7.16.1.1.B.4

Network Protectors

600-Volt Class Network Protector Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.8.B.10; ATS-2025 7.8.D.10; MTS-2023 7.8.B.10

Regulating Apparatus

Regulating Apparatus, Current Acceptance
Cited in: FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10; FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10.1(a); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10.1(b); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10.2(a); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10.2(b); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.10.2(c); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.11; FAA AC 150/5345-10H 3.3.9(b); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 4.2.13(a); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 4.2.13(b); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 4.2.13(c); FAA AC 150/5345-10H 5.1

Protective Relays

Protective Relays, Electromechanical and Solid-State - Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.9.1.B.2; ATS-2025 7.9.1.D.2.1; ATS-2025 7.9.1.D.3; MTS-2023 7.9.1.B.2
Microprocessor-Based Protective Relay Acceptance Test Acceptance / Maintenance
Cited in: ATS-2025 7.9.2.B.4; ATS-2025 7.9.2.D.4; MTS-2023 7.9.2.B.4

Governing standards

Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and Systems

Purchase this standard ↗

Questions

Why test each element of a microprocessor relay separately?

Each function has its own setting, enable bit and logic path, and a mistake in one does not show up in the others. Testing them one at a time confirms that every protection in the study is in service and operates as set.

Is a relay test the same as testing the breaker?

No. A relay test proves the relay's detection, timing and output. The breaker is tested separately, and a trip-through test confirms that the relay output actually opens the breaker, which proves the path between them.

Why must relay settings be read before testing?

The relay should be tested against what it is actually set to, and that must match the approved settings sheet. Reading the settings first catches wrong or missing settings before the test starts.

What are targets and why do they matter?

Targets and indicators record which element operated, which is how engineers analyze an event after a trip. Checking that they set and reset correctly is part of proving the relay works for diagnosis as well as for protection.

Record this test in UltraDb.

Start free ->

UltraDb references ASTM, ANSI, IEEE, NETA, NFPA, NEMA, FAA, TIA, and IEC standards descriptively, to identify the published methods its forms are built from. UltraDb and Verlecta are not affiliated with, endorsed by, certified by, or licensed by NETA, ASTM, ANSI, IEEE, NFPA, NEMA, FAA, TIA, IEC, or Megger. Standard names and section numbers are the property of their respective organizations. Always test to the edition your contract specifies. Where a standard is sold through the ANSI webstore, Verlecta may earn a commission on a purchase made through our link, at no extra cost to you. A commission never decides which standards we cite or how a form is built.